The University of Colorado student residents of Ash House apartments in Boulder can remain in their homes as the property owners and city officials continue their legal battle over code violations at the 12th Street property.
Boulder County District Court on Friday denied an attempt by Boulder city attorneys to lift a placed by the court that blocks, at least for now, city officials鈥� attempts to close Ash House, a privately owned, off-campus apartment building occupied by CU students. The order was extended to Oct. 8, the same day another hearing on the case has been scheduled.
鈥淭he process that was deployed (by Boulder officials) was well-meaning but legally deficient,鈥� Larson said, because the closure order, which attempted to force occupants out within about four hours of posting, did not align with Boulder鈥檚 building-code enforcement guidelines nor did it specifically cite conditions at Ash House that pose an immediate safety risk to Ash House residents. Nor, he said, did Boulder provide student renters with sufficient alternative-housing options.
City officials said on Monday that they had directed Ash House residents to University of Colorado Boulder鈥檚 Off-Campus Housing & Neighborhood Relations Office and Student Legal Services for resources.
Larson ordered that the city and landlord spend the coming weeks mediating their issues and finding alternative-housing accommodations for renters should they have to vacate Ash House.
鈥淎t its core, the city鈥檚 actions regarding Ash House building violations are about life-safety. We believe the current conditions at this building present an immediate life-safety risk to the people living there. While we are disappointed in today鈥檚 outcome, the city will be complying with the court鈥檚 ruling. We are, however, pleased that the property owners have acknowledged the life-safety issues at the property and have committed to restoring it to its approved condition,鈥� Boulder officials said in a statement Friday afternoon.
The city鈥檚 statement continued: 鈥淲e recognize how difficult this situation has been for the impacted students, but we cannot look the other way when we believe community members could be in danger. As an organization, we are committed to protecting the life-safety of these students, and all community members, and holding the property owners accountable. We are exploring all possible options at this point.鈥�
Ash House鈥檚 ownership group 891 12th St LLC, which Boulder code-compliance officers claim improperly modified apartments to add more bedrooms than is permitted by city-issued permits, sued the city after officials attempted this week to remove renters from the building.
The decision to close the building at 891 12th St. was made 鈥渁fter discovering that the property owner created additional bedrooms per unit without city approval,鈥� the city said Monday in a news release. 鈥淭he result is that the units do not meet code and life-safety requirements.鈥�
Ash House was originally built in 1923 to serve as the Sigma Alpha Epsilon fraternity house and was taken over in 1973 and converted into the Marpa House, which provided housing for members of the Shambhala community.
If not for the restraining order, about 60 students would have been forced to vacate.
Developer John Kirkland, along with a group of investors who purchased the Marpa House in 2019 for $5 million, won approval from Boulder City Council in May 2021 to transform the property into apartments for CU students despite vocal opposition from neighborhood residents. The redevelopment project finished during last school year.
Neighbors were concerned about noise and disruptive behavior from student residents. As a result, Boulder officials included a series of conditions to their 2021 approval that included strict quiet hours, limits to the number of cars renters are permitted, 24-7 onsite management, occupancy limits of one person per bedroom and a good-neighbor agreement with surrounding property owners. Violations could have resulted in the city revoking Ash House鈥檚 rental license.
鈥淲e鈥檙e extremely empathetic and receptive to the range of very emotional pleas from neighbors who have shared their views on this from the beginning,鈥� project consultant Rob O鈥橠ea said during a 2021 hearing on the redevelopment proposal, adding that the developer 鈥済et[s] where they鈥檙e coming from.鈥�
However, he said, 鈥淚t will be hands down the nicest, highest-quality and best-managed property in this area.鈥�
The plans that Boulder officials approved three years ago allow for 48 residents spread across 16 three-bedroom units to live at the property at any one time. But when code officers with Boulder鈥檚 planning and development services department, responding to a tenant complaint, inspected Ash House last week, they discovered that units had been illegally subdivided to create new bedrooms and cram in additional renters, the city claims.
鈥淪pecifically, 15 new bedrooms were constructed without building permits, land use approval or life-safety inspections, evidently in the days immediately after city building inspectors had conducted inspections on the previously allowed and permitted construction,鈥� Boulder officials said in a new release. 鈥淭hirteen of those 15 bedrooms were occupied.鈥�
The release continued: 鈥淭here is no scenario, based on the size of the units, under which the city could have approved a fourth bedroom for the units under current code or zoning. In addition, the owners did not have permits for the electrical work that was conducted when the new bedrooms were added.鈥�
City officials had hoped to keep residents out of Ash House until the room modifications are removed and the property meets the specifications spelled out by the previously approved conditions, the city said.
Ash House owners, in their lawsuit filed Monday, said that this summer they made 鈥渋mprovements to thirteen units within the Property, such as extending four-foot 鈥榩ony鈥� walls up to the ceiling, and adding doors to the newly partitioned area.鈥�
The newly extended 鈥渨alls were purely to partition the structure and were not load-bearing or otherwise structural,鈥� the lawsuit said.
Because the work performed in the units was of a 鈥渓imited nature,鈥� Ash House鈥檚 owners 鈥渄id not believe that it required City authorization or permitting and did not consult the City.鈥�
Further, the property owner is not 鈥渁ware of any immediate dangers to its tenants or property manager and does not believe that any such dangers exist.鈥�
Editor鈥檚 note: This story has been updated to include a comment from Boulder officials made after Friday鈥檚 hearing.
The lawsuit is 891 12th St LLC v. City of Boulder, case number 2024CV30767 filed Sept. 17 in Boulder County District Court.
Lucas High is a reporter for BizWest and his work is regularly featured on KUNC. You can reach Lucas at lhigh@bizwest.com.
