Controversy over the Colorado Department of Transportation鈥檚 first public private partnership along U.S. 36 has risen in recent weeks.
On Wednesday a group of community activists plans to file a lawsuit to try and slow it down.
The nonprofit is behind the lawsuit and says an Environmental Impact Assessment on plans to build a new toll lane was never completed.
"I can't say that it's a bad contract, I can't say that it's a good one, that's the problem..."
鈥淭he bottom line is that the is seriously flawed,鈥� said Ken Beitel, a clean energy analyst with non-profit . 鈥淭he EIA claims that daily carbon emissions from the 100,000 vehicles on US 36 are just a drop in the bucket compared with total global emissions and hence, don鈥檛 need to be considered.鈥�
State officials counter that the process was wide-ranging.
鈥淚t was an extensive outreach process that was conducted between 2003 and 2009 that concluded with a signed record of decision with the federal highway administration,鈥� said spokeswoman Amy Ford. 鈥淪o that process was very thorough, very comprehensive and involved the public extensively on what really the final solution should be in this corridor.鈥�
The private company the Plenary group will pay for part of the toll lane鈥檚 construction and maintain the road for 50 years. Democratic House Majority Leader Dickey Lee Hullinghorst of Boulder is one of 14 lawmakers with concerns about the plan.
鈥淚 can鈥檛 say that it鈥檚 a bad contract, I can鈥檛 say that it鈥檚 a good one, that鈥檚 the problem,鈥� said Hullinghorst. 鈥淪o I wouldn鈥檛 mind having this held up just a little bit to get some explanation so that our citizens feel more comfortable with this.鈥�
Every city and county government along the road has signed off to ease congestion. The new law will accommodate toll drivers, rapid bus and HOV passengers. State lawmakers say Colorado doesn鈥檛 have enough money to pay for the entire project itself. The financial close is scheduled for the end of February and the updates to U.S. 36 will be complete in 2016.
